Machine Learning for QoS Prediction in Vehicular Communication: Challenges and Solution Approaches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As cellular networks evolve towards the 6th generation, machine learning is seen as a key enabling technology to improve the capabilities of the network. Machine learning provides a methodology for predictive systems, which can make networks become proactive. This proactive behavior of the network can be leveraged to sustain, for example, a specific quality of service requirement. With predictive quality of service, a wide variety of new use cases, both safety- and entertainment-related, are emerging, especially in the automotive sector. Therefore, in this work, we consider maximum throughput prediction enhancing, for example, streaming or high-definition mapping applications. We discuss the entire machine learning workflow highlighting less regarded aspects such as the detailed sampling procedures, the in-depth analysis of the dataset characteristics, the effects of splits in the provided results, and the data availability. Reliable machine learning models need to face a lot of challenges during their lifecycle. We highlight how confidence can be built on machine learning technologies by better understanding the underlying characteristics of the collected data. We discuss feature engineering and the effects of different splits for the training processes, showcasing that random splits might overestimate performance by more than twofold. Moreover, we investigate diverse sets of input features, where network information proved to be most effective, cutting the error by half. Part of our contribution is the validation of multiple machine learning models within diverse scenarios. We also use explainable AI to show that machine learning can learn underlying principles of wireless networks without being explicitly programmed. Our data is collected from a deployed network that was under full control of the measurement team and covered different vehicular scenarios and radio environments.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2023.
Builds on
12 of 72 references.
References · 12
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 470
- 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 212
- 2021Concept drift detection and adaptation for federated and continual learningcited by 32
- 2017A Systematic Study of Online Class Imbalance Learning with Concept Driftcited by 28
- 2020Handling Concept Drift for Predictions in Business Process Miningcited by 7
- 2020QoS Evaluation and Prediction for C-V2X Communication in Commercially-Deployed LTE and Mobile Edge Networkscited by 6
- 2022Berlin V2X: A Machine Learning Dataset from Multiple Vehicles and Radio Access Technologiescited by 6
- 2017On the Runtime-Efficacy Trade-off of Anomaly Detection Techniques for Real-Time Streaming Datacited by 5
- 2021Machine Learning-Enabled Data Rate Prediction for 5G NSA Vehicle-to-Cloud Communicationscited by 2
- 2022Toward an AI-enabled Connected Industry: AGV Communication and Sensor Measurement Datasetscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.