mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Generalizability of Explanations

arXiv 2302.11965 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2023cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to the absence of ground truth, objective evaluation of explainability methods is an essential research direction. So far, the vast majority of evaluations can be summarized into three categories, namely human evaluation, sensitivity testing, and salinity check. This work proposes a novel evaluation methodology from the perspective of generalizability. We employ an Autoencoder to learn the distributions of the generated explanations and observe their learnability as well as the plausibility of the learned distributional features. We first briefly demonstrate the evaluation idea of the proposed approach at LIME, and then quantitatively evaluate multiple popular explainability methods. We also find that smoothing the explanations with SmoothGrad can significantly enhance the generalizability of explanations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2023.

Builds on

22 of 35 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  6. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  7. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  8. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  9. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  10. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  11. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  12. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
10 more
  1. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  2. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  3. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
  4. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
  5. 2020Evaluating Saliency Map Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks: A User Studycited by 86
  6. 2020Understanding SSIMcited by 75
  7. 2018How do Humans Understand Explanations from Machine Learning Systems? An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
  8. 2018Local Explanation Methods for Deep Neural Networks Lack Sensitivity to Parameter Valuescited by 40
  9. 2016Gradients of Counterfactualscited by 31
  10. 2020A Modified Perturbed Sampling Method for Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanationcited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.