mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improved uncertainty quantification for neural networks with Bayesian last layer

arXiv 2302.10975 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uncertainty quantification is an important task in machine learning - a task in which standardneural networks (NNs) have traditionally not excelled. This can be a limitation for safety-critical applications, where uncertainty-aware methods like Gaussian processes or Bayesian linear regression are often preferred. Bayesian neural networks are an approach to address this limitation. They assume probability distributions for all parameters and yield distributed predictions. However, training and inference are typically intractable and approximations must be employed. A promising approximation is NNs with Bayesian last layer (BLL). They assume distributed weights only in the linear output layer and yield a normally distributed prediction. To approximate the intractable Bayesian neural network, point estimates of the distributed weights in all but the last layer should be obtained by maximizing the marginal likelihood. This has previously been challenging, as the marginal likelihood is expensive to evaluate in this setting. We present a reformulation of the log-marginal likelihood of a NN with BLL which allows for efficient training using backpropagation. Furthermore, we address the challenge of uncertainty quantification for extrapolation points. We provide a metric to quantify the degree of extrapolation and derive a method to improve the uncertainty quantification for these points. Our methods are derived for the multivariate case and demonstrated in a simulation study. In comparison to Bayesian linear regression with fixed features, and a Bayesian neural network trained with variational inference, our proposed method achieves the highest log-predictive density on test data.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2023.

Builds on

13 of 42 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  4. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  5. 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 440
  6. 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 336
  7. 2015Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 284
  8. 2018When Gaussian Process Meets Big Data: A Review of Scalable GPscited by 205
  9. 2017Cautious Model Predictive Control using Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 91
  10. 2021Learning in High Dimension Always Amounts to Extrapolationcited by 62
  11. 2018Efficient representation and approximation of model predictive control laws via deep learningcited by 55
  12. 2019Benchmarking the Neural Linear Model for Regressioncited by 31
1 more
  1. 2020Deep Latent-Variable Kernel Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

11 papers.