mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An evaluation of deep learning models for predicting water depth evolution in urban floods

arXiv 2302.10062 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2023cs.LG physics.ao-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this technical report we compare different deep learning models for prediction of water depth rasters at high spatial resolution. Efficient, accurate, and fast methods for water depth prediction are nowadays important as urban floods are increasing due to higher rainfall intensity caused by climate change, expansion of cities and changes in land use. While hydrodynamic models models can provide reliable forecasts by simulating water depth at every location of a catchment, they also have a high computational burden which jeopardizes their application to real-time prediction in large urban areas at high spatial resolution. Here, we propose to address this issue by using data-driven techniques. Specifically, we evaluate deep learning models which are trained to reproduce the data simulated by the CADDIES cellular-automata flood model, providing flood forecasts that can occur at different future time horizons. The advantage of using such models is that they can learn the underlying physical phenomena a priori, preventing manual parameter setting and computational burden. We perform experiments on a dataset consisting of two catchments areas within Switzerland with 18 simpler, short rainfall patterns and 4 long, more complex ones. Our results show that the deep learning models present in general lower errors compared to the other methods, especially for water depths >0.5m. However, when testing on more complex rainfall events or unseen catchment areas, the deep models do not show benefits over the simpler ones.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2023.

Builds on

6 of 49 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2019Towards Learning Universal, Regional, and Local Hydrological Behaviors via Machine-Learning Applied to Large-Sample Datasetscited by 68
  5. 2019Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Literature Reviewcited by 36
  6. 2020Data-driven Flood Emulation: Speeding up Urban Flood Predictions by Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.