Leveraging Reviews: Learning to Price with Buyer and Seller Uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In online marketplaces, customers have access to hundreds of reviews for a single product. Buyers often use reviews from other customers that share their type -- such as height for clothing, skin type for skincare products, and location for outdoor furniture -- to estimate their values, which they may not know a priori. Customers with few relevant reviews may hesitate to make a purchase except at a low price, so for the seller, there is a tension between setting high prices and ensuring that there are enough reviews so that buyers can confidently estimate their values. Simultaneously, sellers may use reviews to gauge the demand for items they wish to sell. In this work, we study this pricing problem in an online setting where the seller interacts with a set of buyers of finitely many types, one by one, over a series of T rounds. At each round, the seller first sets a price. Then a buyer arrives and examines the reviews of the previous buyers with the same type, which reveal those buyers' ex-post values. Based on the reviews, the buyer decides to purchase if they have good reason to believe that their ex-ante utility is positive. Crucially, the seller does not know the buyer's type when setting the price, nor even the distribution over types. We provide a no-regret algorithm that the seller can use to obtain high revenue. When there are d types, after T rounds, our algorithm achieves a problem-independent tilde O(T2/3d1/3) regret bound. However, when the smallest probability qmin that any given type appears is large, specifically when qmin ∈ Omega(d-2/3T-1/3), then the same algorithm achieves a tilde O(T1/2qmin-1/2) regret bound. We complement these upper bounds with matching lower bounds in both regimes, showing that our algorithm is minimax optimal up to lower-order terms.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2023.
Builds on
11 of 27 references.
References · 11
- 2016On Explore-Then-Commit Strategiescited by 46
- 2017Selling to a No-Regret Buyercited by 43
- 2015Online learning in repeated auctionscited by 39
- 2017Learning to Bid Without Knowing your Valuecited by 34
- 2015Econometrics for Learning Agentscited by 23
- 2014Perfect Bayesian Equilibria in Repeated Salescited by 6
- 2019Stochastic One-Sided Full-Information Banditcited by 5
- 2020VCG Mechanism Design with Unknown Agent Values under Stochastic Bandit Feedbackcited by 5
- 2014On the Complexity of Dynamic Mechanism Designcited by 4
- 2016Sequential Mechanisms with ex-post Participation Guaranteescited by 4
- 2020Social Learning in Non-Stationary Environmentscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Learning to Price Homogeneous Datacited by 2
- 2024Learning to Price Homogeneous Data7 Jul 2024