Improving the Out-Of-Distribution Generalization Capability of Language Models: Counterfactually-Augmented Data is not Enough
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactually-Augmented Data (CAD) has the potential to improve language models' Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) generalization capability, as CAD induces language models to exploit causal features and exclude spurious correlations. However, the empirical results of OOD generalization on CAD are not as efficient as expected. In this paper, we attribute the inefficiency to Myopia Phenomenon caused by CAD: language models only focus on causal features that are edited in the augmentation and exclude other non-edited causal features. As a result, the potential of CAD is not fully exploited. Based on the structural properties of CAD, we design two additional constraints to help language models extract more complete causal features contained in CAD, thus improving the OOD generalization capability. We evaluate our method on two tasks: Sentiment Analysis and Natural Language Inference, and the experimental results demonstrate that our method could unlock CAD's potential and improve language models' OOD generalization capability.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2023.
Builds on
17 of 29 references.
References · 17
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 762
- 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 431
- 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
- 2020The Risks of Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 262
- 2020Robustness to Spurious Correlations in Text Classification via Automatically Generated Counterfactualscited by 67
- 2020Learning What Makes a Difference from Counterfactual Examples and Gradient Supervisioncited by 66
5 more
- 2020Identifying Spurious Correlations for Robust Text Classificationcited by 59
- 2021An Investigation of the (In)effectiveness of Counterfactually Augmented Datacited by 42
- 2021Exploring the Efficacy of Automatically Generated Counterfactuals for Sentiment Analysiscited by 30
- 2020Counterfactually-Augmented SNLI Training Data Does Not Yield Better Generalization Than Unaugmented Datacited by 27
- 2018Explicit Interaction Model towards Text Classificationcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Comparable Demonstrations are Important in In-Context Learning: A Novel Perspective on Demonstration Selectioncited by 5
- 2025Counterfactual Reasoning for Steerable Pluralistic Value Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2023Chain-of-Thought Tuning: Masked Language Models can also Think Step By Step in Natural Language Understandingcited by 4
- 2025Counterfactual Reasoning for Steerable Pluralistic Value Alignment of Large Language Models21 Oct 2025
- 2023Comparable Demonstrations are Important in In-Context Learning: A Novel Perspective on Demonstration Selection12 Dec 2023
- 2023Chain-of-Thought Tuning: Masked Language Models can also Think Step By Step in Natural Language Understanding18 Oct 2023