Uncertainty quantification for nonlinear solid mechanics using reduced order models with Gaussian process regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) tasks, such as sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation, entail a huge computational complexity when dealing with input-output maps involving the solution of nonlinear differential problems, because of the need to query expensive numerical solvers repeatedly. Projection-based reduced order models (ROMs), such as the Galerkin-reduced basis (RB) method, have been extensively developed in the last decades to overcome the computational complexity of high fidelity full order models (FOMs), providing remarkable speedups when addressing UQ tasks related with parameterized differential problems. Nonetheless, constructing a projection-based ROM that can be efficiently queried usually requires extensive modifications to the original code, a task which is non-trivial for nonlinear problems, or even not possible at all when proprietary software is used. Non-intrusive ROMs - which rely on the FOM as a black box - have been recently developed to overcome this issue. In this work, we consider ROMs exploiting proper orthogonal decomposition to construct a reduced basis from a set of FOM snapshots, and Gaussian process regression (GPR) to approximate the RB projection coefficients. Two different approaches, namely a global GPR and a tensor-decomposition-based GPR, are explored on a set of 3D time-dependent solid mechanics examples. Finally, the non-intrusive ROM is exploited to perform global sensitivity analysis (relying on both screening and variance-based methods) and parameter estimation (through Markov chain Monte Carlo methods), showing remarkable computational speedups and very good accuracy compared to high-fidelity FOMs.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Recent Advances and Applications of Machine Learning in Experimental Solid Mechanics: A Reviewcited by 15
- 2024GFN: A graph feedforward network for resolution-invariant reduced operator learning in multifidelity applicationscited by 10
- 2023Gaussian process learning of nonlinear dynamicscited by 5
- 2025Towards scientific machine learning for granular material simulations -- challenges and opportunitiescited by 1
- 2025Real-Time Structural Health Monitoring with Bayesian Neural Networks: Distinguishing Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty for Digital Twin Frameworkscited by 0
- 2025Active learning for data-driven reduced models of parametric differential systems with Bayesian operator inferencecited by 0
- 2026An adjoint method for training data-driven reduced-order modelscited by 0
- 2026An adjoint method for training data-driven reduced-order models12 Jan 2026
- 2025Active learning for data-driven reduced models of parametric differential systems with Bayesian operator inference30 Dec 2025
- 2025Real-Time Structural Health Monitoring with Bayesian Neural Networks: Distinguishing Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty for Digital Twin Frameworks2 Dec 2025
- 2025Towards scientific machine learning for granular material simulations -- challenges and opportunities1 Apr 2025
- 2024GFN: A graph feedforward network for resolution-invariant reduced operator learning in multifidelity applications5 Jun 2024
- 2023Gaussian process learning of nonlinear dynamics19 Dec 2023
- 2023Recent Advances and Applications of Machine Learning in Experimental Solid Mechanics: A Review14 Mar 2023