mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Targeted Attack on GPT-Neo for the SATML Language Model Data Extraction Challenge

arXiv 2302.07735 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.CRcited by 7

On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous work has shown that Large Language Models are susceptible to so-called data extraction attacks. This allows an attacker to extract a sample that was contained in the training data, which has massive privacy implications. The construction of data extraction attacks is challenging, current attacks are quite inefficient, and there exists a significant gap in the extraction capabilities of untargeted attacks and memorization. Thus, targeted attacks are proposed, which identify if a given sample from the training data, is extractable from a model. In this work, we apply a targeted data extraction attack to the SATML2023 Language Model Training Data Extraction Challenge. We apply a two-step approach. In the first step, we maximise the recall of the model and are able to extract the suffix for 69% of the samples. In the second step, we use a classifier-based Membership Inference Attack on the generations. Our AutoSklearn classifier achieves a precision of 0.841. The full approach reaches a score of 0.405 recall at a 10% false positive rate, which is an improvement of 34% over the baseline of 0.301.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 7 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2023.

Builds on

7 of 12 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Quantifying Privacy Risks of Masked Language Models Using Membership Inference Attacks8 Mar
  2. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles7 Dec
  3. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey14 Mar

Other references · 4

  1. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  2. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  3. 2022CodeFill: Multi-token Code Completion by Jointly Learning from Structure and Naming Sequencescited by 49
  4. 2023Extending Source Code Pre-Trained Language Models to Summarise Decompiled Binariescited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 4.

7 papers.