Netizens, Academicians, and Information Professionals' Opinions About AI With Special Reference To ChatGPT
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study aims to understand the perceptions and opinions of academicians towards ChatGPT-3 by collecting and analyzing social media comments, and a survey was conducted with library and information science professionals. The research uses a content analysis method and finds that while ChatGPT-3 can be a valuable tool for research and writing, it is not 100% accurate and should be cross-checked. The study also finds that while some academicians may not accept ChatGPT-3, most are starting to accept it. The study is beneficial for academicians, content developers, and librarians.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2023.
Builds on
0 of 15 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.