mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Simplified Continuous High Dimensional Belief Space Planning with Adaptive Probabilistic Belief-dependent Constraints

arXiv 2302.06697 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2023cs.AI cs.ROcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Online decision making under uncertainty in partially observable domains, also known as Belief Space Planning, is a fundamental problem in robotics and Artificial Intelligence. Due to an abundance of plausible future unravelings, calculating an optimal course of action inflicts an enormous computational burden on the agent. Moreover, in many scenarios, e.g., information gathering, it is required to introduce a belief-dependent constraint. Prompted by this demand, in this paper, we consider a recently introduced probabilistic belief-dependent constrained POMDP. We present a technique to adaptively accept or discard a candidate action sequence with respect to a probabilistic belief-dependent constraint, before expanding a complete set of future observations samples and without any loss in accuracy. Moreover, using our proposed framework, we contribute an adaptive method to find a maximal feasible return (e.g., information gain) in terms of Value at Risk for the candidate action sequence with substantial acceleration. On top of that, we introduce an adaptive simplification technique for a probabilistically constrained setting. Such an approach provably returns an identical-quality solution while dramatically accelerating online decision making. Our universal framework applies to any belief-dependent constrained continuous POMDP with parametric beliefs, as well as nonparametric beliefs represented by particles. In the context of an information-theoretic constraint, our presented framework stochastically quantifies if a cumulative information gain along the planning horizon is sufficiently significant (e.g. for, information gathering, active SLAM). We apply our method to active SLAM, a highly challenging problem of high dimensional Belief Space Planning. Extensive realistic simulations corroborate the superiority of our proposed ideas.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2023.

Builds on

12 of 51 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Agecited by 411
  2. 2017Online algorithms for POMDPs with continuous state, action, and observation spacescited by 84
  3. 2022A Survey on Active Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: State of the Art and New Frontierscited by 66
  4. 2019Simplified decision making in the belief space using belief sparsificationcited by 10
  5. 2021iX-BSP: Incremental Belief Space Planningcited by 6
  6. 2021Simplified Belief-Dependent Reward MCTS Planning with Guaranteed Tree Consistencycited by 6
  7. 2022Adaptive Information Belief Space Planningcited by 6
  8. 2022D2A-BSP: Distilled Data Association Belief Space Planning with Performance Guarantees Under Budget Constraintscited by 6
  9. 2022Nonmyopic Distilled Data Association Belief Space Planning Under Budget Constraintscited by 5
  10. 2019Topological Information-Theoretic Belief Space Planning with Optimality Guaranteescited by 3
  11. 2022Risk Aware Adaptive Belief-dependent Probabilistically Constrained Continuous POMDP Planningcited by 3
  12. 2022Enough is Enough: Towards Autonomous Uncertainty-driven Stopping Criteriacited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.