Recommending to Strategic Users
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recommendation systems are pervasive in the digital economy. An important assumption in many deployed systems is that user consumption reflects user preferences in a static sense: users consume the content they like with no other considerations in mind. However, as we document in a large-scale online survey, users do choose content strategically to influence the types of content they get recommended in the future. We model this user behavior as a two-stage noisy signalling game between the recommendation system and users: the recommendation system initially commits to a recommendation policy, presents content to the users during a cold start phase which the users choose to strategically consume in order to affect the types of content they will be recommended in a recommendation phase. We show that in equilibrium, users engage in behaviors that accentuate their differences to users of different preference profiles. In addition, (statistical) minorities out of fear of losing their minority content exposition may not consume content that is liked by mainstream users. We next propose three interventions that may improve recommendation quality (both on average and for minorities) when taking into account strategic consumption: (1) Adopting a recommendation system policy that uses preferences from a prior, (2) Communicating to users that universally liked ("mainstream") content will not be used as basis of recommendation, and (3) Serving content that is personalized-enough yet expected to be liked in the beginning. Finally, we describe a methodology to inform applied theory modeling with survey results.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 3.
8 papers.
- 2024Clickbait vs. Quality: How Engagement-Based Optimization Shapes the Content Landscape in Online Platformscited by 13
- 2024Accounting for AI and Users Shaping One Another: The Role of Mathematical Modelscited by 11
- 2024Algorithmic Collective Action in Recommender Systems: Promoting Songs by Reordering Playlistscited by 7
- 2023Incentivizing High-Quality Content in Online Recommender Systemscited by 6
- 2025Incentive-Aware Machine Learning; Robustness, Fairness, Improvement & Causalitycited by 5
- 2024Measuring Strategization in Recommendation: Users Adapt Their Behavior to Shape Future Contentcited by 3
- 2025Welfare as a Guiding Principle for Machine Learning -- From Compass, to Lens, to Roadmapcited by 2
- 2025The Burden of Interactive Alignment with Inconsistent Preferencescited by 1
- 2025The Burden of Interactive Alignment with Inconsistent Preferences18 Oct 2025
- 2025Incentive-Aware Machine Learning; Robustness, Fairness, Improvement & Causality8 May 2025
- 2025Welfare as a Guiding Principle for Machine Learning -- From Compass, to Lens, to Roadmap17 Feb 2025
- 2024Measuring Strategization in Recommendation: Users Adapt Their Behavior to Shape Future Content9 May 2024
- 2024Accounting for AI and Users Shaping One Another: The Role of Mathematical Models18 Apr 2024
- 2024Algorithmic Collective Action in Recommender Systems: Promoting Songs by Reordering Playlists19 Mar 2024
- 2024Clickbait vs. Quality: How Engagement-Based Optimization Shapes the Content Landscape in Online Platforms18 Jan 2024
- 2023Incentivizing High-Quality Content in Online Recommender Systems13 Jun 2023