mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Identifying Semantically Difficult Samples to Improve Text Classification

arXiv 2302.06155 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we investigate the effect of addressing difficult samples from a given text dataset on the downstream text classification task. We define difficult samples as being non-obvious cases for text classification by analysing them in the semantic embedding space; specifically - (i) semantically similar samples that belong to different classes and (ii) semantically dissimilar samples that belong to the same class. We propose a penalty function to measure the overall difficulty score of every sample in the dataset. We conduct exhaustive experiments on 13 standard datasets to show a consistent improvement of up to 9% and discuss qualitative results to show effectiveness of our approach in identifying difficult samples for a text classification model.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2023.

Builds on

9 of 21 references.

References · 9

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  3. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  4. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  5. 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
  6. 2019Data Valuation using Reinforcement Learningcited by 115
  7. 2019Improving Neural Conversational Models with Entropy-Based Data Filteringcited by 30
  8. 2019SemEval-2016 Task 4: Sentiment Analysis in Twittercited by 14
  9. 2018Evolutionary Data Measures: Understanding the Difficulty of Text Classification Taskscited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.