Overview of the TREC 2022 Fair Ranking Track
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The TREC Fair Ranking Track aims to provide a platform for participants to develop and evaluate novel retrieval algorithms that can provide a fair exposure to a mixture of demographics or attributes, such as ethnicity, that are represented by relevant documents in response to a search query. For example, particular demographics or attributes can be represented by the documents topical content or authors. The 2022 Fair Ranking Track adopted a resource allocation task. The task focused on supporting Wikipedia editors who are looking to improve the encyclopedia's coverage of topics under the purview of a WikiProject. WikiProject coordinators and/or Wikipedia editors search for Wikipedia documents that are in need of editing to improve the quality of the article. The 2022 Fair Ranking track aimed to ensure that documents that are about, or somehow represent, certain protected characteristics receive a fair exposure to the Wikipedia editors, so that the documents have an fair opportunity of being improved and, therefore, be well-represented in Wikipedia. The under-representation of particular protected characteristics in Wikipedia can result in systematic biases that can have a negative human, social, and economic impact, particularly for disadvantaged or protected societal groups.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024Does RAG Introduce Unfairness in LLMs? Evaluating Fairness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemscited by 26
- 2025Your RAG is Unfair: Exposing Fairness Vulnerabilities in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Backdoor Attackscited by 8
- 2025Evaluating the Effect of Retrieval Augmentation on Social Biasescited by 7
- 2026Does Reasoning Make Search More Fair? Comparing Fairness in Reasoning and Non-Reasoning Rerankerscited by 2
- 2026CoverageBench: Evaluating Information Coverage across Tasks and Domainscited by 2
- 2026Who Benefits from RAG? The Role of Exposure, Utility and Attribution Biascited by 1
- 2025Towards Fair Rankings: Leveraging LLMs for Gender Bias Detection and Measurementcited by 0
- 2026Who Benefits from RAG? The Role of Exposure, Utility and Attribution Bias25 Mar 2026
- 2026CoverageBench: Evaluating Information Coverage across Tasks and Domains20 Mar 2026
- 2026Does Reasoning Make Search More Fair? Comparing Fairness in Reasoning and Non-Reasoning Rerankers11 Mar 2026
- 2025Your RAG is Unfair: Exposing Fairness Vulnerabilities in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Backdoor Attacks26 Sep 2025
- 2025Towards Fair Rankings: Leveraging LLMs for Gender Bias Detection and Measurement27 Jun 2025
- 2025Evaluating the Effect of Retrieval Augmentation on Social Biases24 Feb 2025
- 2024Does RAG Introduce Unfairness in LLMs? Evaluating Fairness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems29 Sep 2024