ControversialQA: Exploring Controversy in Question Answering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Controversy is widespread online. Previous studies mainly define controversy based on vague assumptions of its relation to sentiment such as hate speech and offensive words. This paper introduces the first question-answering dataset that defines content controversy by user perception, i.e., votes from plenty of users. It contains nearly 10K questions, and each question has a best answer and a most controversial answer. Experimental results reveal that controversy detection in question answering is essential and challenging, and there is no strong correlation between controversy and sentiment tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2023.
Builds on
9 of 20 references.
References · 9
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
- 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 417
- 2021Efficiently Teaching an Effective Dense Retriever with Balanced Topic Aware Samplingcited by 238
- 2014Controversy and Sentiment in Online Newscited by 6
- 2017The Ebb and Flow of Controversial Debates on Social Mediacited by 2
- 2017The Effect of Collective Attention on Controversial Debates on Social Mediacited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.