Introduction To Gaussian Process Regression In Bayesian Inverse Problems, With New ResultsOn Experimental Design For Weighted Error Measures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian posterior distributions arising in modern applications, including inverse problems in partial differential equation models in tomography and subsurface flow, are often computationally intractable due to the large computational cost of evaluating the data likelihood. To alleviate this problem, we consider using Gaussian process regression to build a surrogate model for the likelihood, resulting in an approximate posterior distribution that is amenable to computations in practice. This work serves as an introduction to Gaussian process regression, in particular in the context of building surrogate models for inverse problems, and presents new insights into a suitable choice of training points. We show that the error between the true and approximate posterior distribution can be bounded by the error between the true and approximate likelihood, measured in the L2-norm weighted by the true posterior, and that efficiently bounding the error between the true and approximate likelihood in this norm suggests choosing the training points in the Gaussian process surrogate model based on the true posterior.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2023.
Builds on
9 of 50 references.
References · 9
- 2018Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalencescited by 192
- 2020Convergence Guarantees for Gaussian Process Means With Misspecified Likelihoods and Smoothnesscited by 30
- 2017Probabilistic Numerical Methods for PDE-constrained Bayesian Inverse Problemscited by 20
- 2019On the well-posedness of Bayesian inverse problemscited by 20
- 2019Parallel Gaussian process surrogate Bayesian inference with noisy likelihood evaluationscited by 18
- 2014Accelerating Asymptotically Exact MCMC for Computationally Intensive Models via Local Approximationscited by 17
- 2017On the Sampling Problem for Kernel Quadraturecited by 7
- 2017Iterative Updating of Model Error for Bayesian Inversioncited by 7
- 2017Random forward models and log-likelihoods in Bayesian inverse problemscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Gaussian processes for Bayesian inverse problems associated with linear partial differential equationscited by 9
- 2024Enhancing Gaussian Process Surrogates for Optimization and Posterior Approximation via Random Explorationcited by 8
- 2025Bayesian Optimization with Inexact Acquisition: Is Random Grid Search Sufficient?cited by 5
- 2025Efficient optimization of expensive black-box simulators via marginal means, with application to neutrino detector designcited by 2
- 2026Neural network surrogates with uncertainty quantification for inverse problems in partial differential equationscited by 0
- 2026A Convex Approximation Framework for Neural Likelihood-Based Bayesian Inverse Problemscited by 0
- 2026A Convex Approximation Framework for Neural Likelihood-Based Bayesian Inverse Problems7 Jul 2026
- 2026Neural network surrogates with uncertainty quantification for inverse problems in partial differential equations18 Jun 2026
- 2025Efficient optimization of expensive black-box simulators via marginal means, with application to neutrino detector design3 Aug 2025
- 2025Bayesian Optimization with Inexact Acquisition: Is Random Grid Search Sufficient?13 Jun 2025
- 2024Enhancing Gaussian Process Surrogates for Optimization and Posterior Approximation via Random Exploration30 Jan 2024
- 2023Gaussian processes for Bayesian inverse problems associated with linear partial differential equations17 Jul 2023