mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Calibrated Recommendations for Users with Decaying Attention

arXiv 2302.03239 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2023cs.DS cs.GT cs.SIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommendation systems capable of providing diverse sets of results are a focus of increasing importance, with motivations ranging from fairness to novelty and other aspects of optimizing user experience. One form of diversity of recent interest is calibration, the notion that personalized recommendations should reflect the full distribution of a user's interests, rather than a single predominant category -- for instance, a user who mainly reads entertainment news but also wants to keep up with news on the environment and the economy would prefer to see a mixture of these genres, not solely entertainment news. Existing work has formulated calibration as a subset selection problem; this line of work observes that the formulation requires the unrealistic assumption that all recommended items receive equal consideration from the user, but leaves as an open question the more realistic setting in which user attention decays as they move down the list of results. In this paper, we consider calibration with decaying user attention under two different models. In both models, there is a set of underlying genres that items can belong to. In the first setting, where items are represented by fine-grained mixtures of genre percentages, we provide a (1-1/e)-approximation algorithm by extending techniques for constrained submodular optimization. In the second setting, where items are coarsely binned into a single genre each, we surpass the (1-1/e) barrier imposed by submodular maximization and give a 2/3-approximate greedy algorithm. Our work thus addresses the problem of capturing ordering effects due to decaying attention, allowing for the extension of near-optimal calibration from recommendation sets to recommendation lists.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.