Guide the Learner: Controlling Product of Experts Debiasing Method Based on Token Attribution Similarities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Several proposals have been put forward in recent years for improving out-of-distribution (OOD) performance through mitigating dataset biases. A popular workaround is to train a robust model by re-weighting training examples based on a secondary biased model. Here, the underlying assumption is that the biased model resorts to shortcut features. Hence, those training examples that are correctly predicted by the biased model are flagged as being biased and are down-weighted during the training of the main model. However, assessing the importance of an instance merely based on the predictions of the biased model may be too naive. It is possible that the prediction of the main model can be derived from another decision-making process that is distinct from the behavior of the biased model. To circumvent this, we introduce a fine-tuning strategy that incorporates the similarity between the main and biased model attribution scores in a Product of Experts (PoE) loss function to further improve OOD performance. With experiments conducted on natural language inference and fact verification benchmarks, we show that our method improves OOD results while maintaining in-distribution (ID) performance.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2023.
Builds on
17 of 19 references.
References · 17
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,676
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,368
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 867
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 664
- 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
- 2022WANLI: Worker and AI Collaboration for Natural Language Inference Dataset Creationcited by 201
- 2019Towards Debiasing Fact Verification Modelscited by 143
- 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 127
- 2019Unlearn Dataset Bias in Natural Language Inference by Fitting the Residualcited by 119
- 2020Towards Debiasing NLU Models from Unknown Biasescited by 116
5 more
- 2021Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Datacited by 91
- 2020Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling themcited by 83
- 2016Investigating the influence of noise and distractors on the interpretation of neural networkscited by 54
- 2021End-to-End Self-Debiasing Framework for Robust NLU Trainingcited by 24
- 2021Don't Discard All the Biased Instances: Investigating a Core Assumption in Dataset Bias Mitigation Techniquescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2026Fair Cognitive Impairment Detection Through Unlearning17 Jun 2026
- 2025FairFlow: Mitigating Dataset Biases through Undecided Learning22 Mar 2025