mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Trust, but Verify: Using Self-Supervised Probing to Improve Trustworthiness

arXiv 2302.02628 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trustworthy machine learning is of primary importance to the practical deployment of deep learning models. While state-of-the-art models achieve astonishingly good performance in terms of accuracy, recent literature reveals that their predictive confidence scores unfortunately cannot be trusted: e.g., they are often overconfident when wrong predictions are made, or so even for obvious outliers. In this paper, we introduce a new approach of self-supervised probing, which enables us to check and mitigate the overconfidence issue for a trained model, thereby improving its trustworthiness. We provide a simple yet effective framework, which can be flexibly applied to existing trustworthiness-related methods in a plug-and-play manner. Extensive experiments on three trustworthiness-related tasks (misclassification detection, calibration and out-of-distribution detection) across various benchmarks verify the effectiveness of our proposed probing framework.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2023.

Builds on

29 of 38 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  5. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  6. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  7. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  8. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,591
  9. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,382
  10. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  11. 2016Colorful Image Colorizationcited by 1,114
  12. 2015Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Predictioncited by 1,066
17 more
  1. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 802
  2. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
  3. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
  4. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
  5. 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
  6. 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 514
  7. 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 438
  8. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 357
  9. 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
  10. 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 292
  11. 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
  12. 2018To Trust Or Not To Trust A Classifiercited by 207
  13. 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 186
  14. 2020Posterior Network: Uncertainty Estimation without OOD Samples via Density-Based Pseudo-Countscited by 164
  15. 2019The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologiescited by 78
  16. 2021What Does Rotation Prediction Tell Us about Classifier Accuracy under Varying Testing Environments?cited by 63
  17. 2021Detecting Errors and Estimating Accuracy on Unlabeled Data with Self-training Ensemblescited by 54

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

4 papers.