mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Clarifying Trust of Materials Property Predictions using Neural Networks with Distribution-Specific Uncertainty Quantification

arXiv 2302.02595 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2023cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is critical that machine learning (ML) model predictions be trustworthy for high-throughput catalyst discovery approaches. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods allow estimation of the trustworthiness of an ML model, but these methods have not been well explored in the field of heterogeneous catalysis. Herein, we investigate different UQ methods applied to a crystal graph convolutional neural network (CGCNN) to predict adsorption energies of molecules on alloys from the Open Catalyst 2020 (OC20) dataset, the largest existing heterogeneous catalyst dataset. We apply three UQ methods to the adsorption energy predictions, namely k-fold ensembling, Monte Carlo dropout, and evidential regression. The effectiveness of each UQ method is assessed based on accuracy, sharpness, dispersion, calibration, and tightness. Evidential regression is demonstrated to be a powerful approach for rapidly obtaining tunable, competitively trustworthy UQ estimates for heterogeneous catalysis applications when using neural networks. Recalibration of model uncertainties is shown to be essential in practical screening applications of catalysts using uncertainties.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2023.

Builds on

22 of 72 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  4. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
  5. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  6. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
  7. 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 354
  8. 2022Equiformer: Equivariant Graph Attention Transformer for 3D Atomistic Graphscited by 258
  9. 2020Fast and Uncertainty-Aware Directional Message Passing for Non-Equilibrium Moleculescited by 254
  10. 2020The Open Catalyst 2020 (OC20) Dataset and Community Challengescited by 246
  11. 2021Geometric and Physical Quantities Improve E(3) Equivariant Message Passingcited by 225
  12. 2018When Gaussian Process Meets Big Data: A Review of Scalable GPscited by 205
10 more
  1. 2019Evaluating and Calibrating Uncertainty Prediction in Regression Taskscited by 85
  2. 2020Beyond Pinball Loss: Quantile Methods for Calibrated Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 77
  3. 2020OrbNet: Deep Learning for Quantum Chemistry Using Symmetry-Adapted Atomic-Orbital Featurescited by 63
  4. 2019Uncertainty Quantification with Statistical Guarantees in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 60
  5. 2021Uncertainty Toolbox: an Open-Source Library for Assessing, Visualizing, and Improving Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 57
  6. 2020Individual Calibration with Randomized Forecastingcited by 50
  7. 2022Spherical Channels for Modeling Atomic Interactionscited by 47
  8. 2019Accurate Uncertainty Estimation and Decomposition in Ensemble Learningcited by 42
  9. 2017Overcoming data scarcity with transfer learningcited by 14
  10. 2022Learned Force Fields Are Ready For Ground State Catalyst Discoverycited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

8 papers.