Variational Inference on the Final-Layer Output of Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Traditional neural networks are simple to train but they typically produce overconfident predictions. In contrast, Bayesian neural networks provide good uncertainty quantification but optimizing them is time consuming due to the large parameter space. This paper proposes to combine the advantages of both approaches by performing Variational Inference in the Final layer Output space (VIFO), because the output space is much smaller than the parameter space. We use neural networks to learn the mean and the variance of the probabilistic output. Using the Bayesian formulation we incorporate collapsed variational inference with VIFO which significantly improves the performance in practice. On the other hand, like standard, non-Bayesian models, VIFO enjoys simple training and one can use Rademacher complexity to provide risk bounds for the model. Experiments show that VIFO provides a good tradeoff in terms of run time and uncertainty quantification, especially for out of distribution data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2023.
Builds on
29 of 50 references.
References · 29
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
- 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 915
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
17 more
- 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 359
- 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?cited by 307
- 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 289
- 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 227
- 2020Posterior Network: Uncertainty Estimation without OOD Samples via Density-Based Pseudo-Countscited by 163
- 2019Functional Variational Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 127
- 2021Repulsive Deep Ensembles are Bayesiancited by 103
- 2016PAC-Bayesian Theory Meets Bayesian Inferencecited by 87
- 2022Pitfalls of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification through Loss Minimisationcited by 65
- 2022Do Bayesian Neural Networks Need To Be Fully Stochastic?cited by 63
- 2020All You Need is a Good Functional Prior for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 61
- 2020On Last-Layer Algorithms for Classification: Decoupling Representation from Uncertainty Estimationcited by 23
- 2015Stochastic Expectation Propagationcited by 22
- 2015Distributed Bayesian Learning with Stochastic Natural-gradient Expectation Propagation and the Posterior Servercited by 17
- 2020Direct loss minimization algorithms for sparse Gaussian processescited by 10
- 2022On the Performance of Direct Loss Minimization for Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.