Machine Learning Methods for Evaluating Public Crisis: Meta-Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study examines machine learning methods used in crisis management. Analyzing detected patterns from a crisis involves the collection and evaluation of historical or near-real-time datasets through automated means. This paper utilized the meta-review method to analyze scientific literature that utilized machine learning techniques to evaluate human actions during crises. Selected studies were condensed into themes and emerging trends using a systematic literature evaluation of published works accessed from three scholarly databases. Results show that data from social media was prominent in the evaluated articles with 27% usage, followed by disaster management, health (COVID) and crisis informatics, amongst many other themes. Additionally, the supervised machine learning method, with an application of 69% across the board, was predominant. The classification technique stood out among other machine learning tasks with 41% usage. The algorithms that played major roles were the Support Vector Machine, Neural Networks, Naive Bayes, and Random Forest, with 23%, 16%, 15%, and 12% contributions, respectively.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2023.
Builds on
4 of 46 references.
References · 4
- 2019Unsupervised Detection of Sub-events in Large Scale Disasterscited by 11
- 2015Identifying Actionable Messages on Social Mediacited by 2
- 2018A Review of Situation Awareness Assessment Approaches in Aviation Environmentscited by 2
- 2019Deep Learning and Word Embeddings for Tweet Classification for Crisis Responsecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.