mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Knowledge Distillation in Vision Transformers: A Critical Review

arXiv 2302.02108 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2023cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In Natural Language Processing (NLP), Transformers have already revolutionized the field by utilizing an attention-based encoder-decoder model. Recently, some pioneering works have employed Transformer-like architectures in Computer Vision (CV) and they have reported outstanding performance of these architectures in tasks such as image classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation. Vision Transformers (ViTs) have demonstrated impressive performance improvements over Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) due to their competitive modelling capabilities. However, these architectures demand massive computational resources which makes these models difficult to be deployed in the resource-constrained applications. Many solutions have been developed to combat this issue, such as compressive transformers and compression functions such as dilated convolution, min-max pooling, 1D convolution, etc. Model compression has recently attracted considerable research attention as a potential remedy. A number of model compression methods have been proposed in the literature such as weight quantization, weight multiplexing, pruning and Knowledge Distillation (KD). However, techniques like weight quantization, pruning and weight multiplexing typically involve complex pipelines for performing the compression. KD has been found to be a simple and much effective model compression technique that allows a relatively simple model to perform tasks almost as accurately as a complex model. This paper discusses various approaches based upon KD for effective compression of ViT models. The paper elucidates the role played by KD in reducing the computational and memory requirements of these models. The paper also presents the various challenges faced by ViTs that are yet to be resolved.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2023.

Builds on

64 of 95 references.

References · 64

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  4. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  5. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  6. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  7. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
  8. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
  9. 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
  10. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,112
  11. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,096
  12. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,009
38 more
  1. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
  2. 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 653
  3. 2021CoAtNet: Marrying Convolution and Attention for All Data Sizescited by 566
  4. 2022Vision Transformer Adapter for Dense Predictionscited by 564
  5. 2019Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?cited by 404
  6. 2021Early Convolutions Help Transformers See Bettercited by 395
  7. 2019On the Relationship between Self-Attention and Convolutional Layerscited by 299
  8. 2017A Survey of Model Compression and Acceleration for Deep Neural Networkscited by 298
  9. 2021Distilling Knowledge via Knowledge Reviewcited by 285
  10. 2019Structured Knowledge Distillation for Dense Predictioncited by 277
  11. 2020The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT Networkscited by 275
  12. 2021Post-Training Quantization for Vision Transformercited by 274
  13. 2021Video Transformer Networkcited by 271
  14. 2021Knowledge distillation: A good teacher is patient and consistentcited by 255
  15. 2022TinyViT: Fast Pretraining Distillation for Small Vision Transformerscited by 232
  16. 2021Scaling Local Self-Attention for Parameter Efficient Visual Backbonescited by 220
  17. 2019Fixing the train-test resolution discrepancycited by 209
  18. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 208
  19. 2022Knowledge Distillation from A Stronger Teachercited by 204
  20. 2020Rethinking Positional Encoding in Language Pre-trainingcited by 197
  21. 2020Channel-wise Knowledge Distillation for Dense Predictioncited by 161
  22. 2020Improving Efficient Neural Ranking Models with Cross-Architecture Knowledge Distillationcited by 143
  23. 2020Knowledge Distillation Meets Self-Supervisioncited by 142
  24. 2021Comparing Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Mean Squared Error Loss in Knowledge Distillationcited by 131
  25. 2022BigDatasetGAN: Synthesizing ImageNet with Pixel-wise Annotationscited by 99
  26. 2020Compressing Large-Scale Transformer-Based Models: A Case Study on BERTcited by 95
  27. 2022MiniViT: Compressing Vision Transformers with Weight Multiplexingcited by 88
  28. 2021Delving Deep into the Generalization of Vision Transformers under Distribution Shiftscited by 85
  29. 2022Unified Visual Transformer Compressioncited by 79
  30. 2021A Practical Survey on Faster and Lighter Transformerscited by 73
  31. 2022Knowledge Distillation via the Target-aware Transformercited by 70
  32. 2022DearKD: Data-Efficient Early Knowledge Distillation for Vision Transformerscited by 65
  33. 2021Learning Efficient Vision Transformers via Fine-Grained Manifold Distillationcited by 60
  34. 2020What Do Position Embeddings Learn? An Empirical Study of Pre-Trained Language Model Positional Encodingcited by 52
  35. 2021Co-advise: Cross Inductive Bias Distillationcited by 40
  36. 2022Cross-Architecture Knowledge Distillationcited by 40
  37. 2021A Simple and Effective Positional Encoding for Transformerscited by 37
  38. 2023A Survey on Efficient Training of Transformerscited by 37

50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 7; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: