Improving the Timing Resolution of Positron Emission Tomography Detectors Using Boosted Learning -- A Residual Physics Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering medical imaging, mainly enhancing image reconstruction. Nevertheless, improvements throughout the entire processing, from signal detection to computation, potentially offer significant benefits. This work presents a novel and versatile approach to detector optimization using machine learning (ML) and residual physics. We apply the concept to positron emission tomography (PET), intending to improve the coincidence time resolution (CTR). PET visualizes metabolic processes in the body by detecting photons with scintillation detectors. Improved CTR performance offers the advantage of reducing radioactive dose exposure for patients. Modern PET detectors with sophisticated concepts and read-out topologies represent complex physical and electronic systems requiring dedicated calibration techniques. Traditional methods primarily depend on analytical formulations successfully describing the main detector characteristics. However, when accounting for higher-order effects, additional complexities arise matching theoretical models to experimental reality. Our work addresses this challenge by combining traditional calibration with AI and residual physics, presenting a highly promising approach. We present a residual physics-based strategy using gradient tree boosting and physics-guided data generation. The explainable AI framework SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to identify known physical effects with learned patterns. In addition, the models were tested against basic physical laws. We were able to improve the CTR significantly (more than 20%) for clinically relevant detectors of 19 mm height, reaching CTRs of 185 ps (450-550 keV).
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2023.
Builds on
19 of 91 references.
References · 19
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
- 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 433
- 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 404
- 2020A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospectscited by 397
- 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
- 2018Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Controlcited by 274
- 2017Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Modelscited by 206
- 2018Residual Policy Learningcited by 164
7 more
- 2019TossingBot: Learning to Throw Arbitrary Objects with Residual Physicscited by 137
- 2019Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 106
- 2016Medical image denoising using convolutional denoising autoencoderscited by 76
- 2017Applications of Deep Learning and Reinforcement Learning to Biological Datacited by 45
- 2019GBDT-MO: Gradient Boosted Decision Trees for Multiple Outputscited by 16
- 2022Federated Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach via Physics-Informed Reward for Multi-Microgrid Energy Managementcited by 11
- 2017Combining Learned and Analytical Models for Predicting Action Effects from Sensory Datacited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.