mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is Model Ensemble Necessary? Model-based RL via a Single Model with Lipschitz Regularized Value Function

arXiv 2302.01244 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2023cs.LGcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Probabilistic dynamics model ensemble is widely used in existing model-based reinforcement learning methods as it outperforms a single dynamics model in both asymptotic performance and sample efficiency. In this paper, we provide both practical and theoretical insights on the empirical success of the probabilistic dynamics model ensemble through the lens of Lipschitz continuity. We find that, for a value function, the stronger the Lipschitz condition is, the smaller the gap between the true dynamics- and learned dynamics-induced Bellman operators is, thus enabling the converged value function to be closer to the optimal value function. Hence, we hypothesize that the key functionality of the probabilistic dynamics model ensemble is to regularize the Lipschitz condition of the value function using generated samples. To test this hypothesis, we devise two practical robust training mechanisms through computing the adversarial noise and regularizing the value network's spectral norm to directly regularize the Lipschitz condition of the value functions. Empirical results show that combined with our mechanisms, model-based RL algorithms with a single dynamics model outperform those with an ensemble of probabilistic dynamics models. These findings not only support the theoretical insight, but also provide a practical solution for developing computationally efficient model-based RL algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2023.

Builds on

24 of 32 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  4. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
  5. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 753
  6. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 748
  7. 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observationscited by 235
  8. 2018Model-Ensemble Trust-Region Policy Optimizationcited by 214
  9. 2018Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Stochastic Ensemble Value Expansioncited by 167
  10. 2014Model-based Reinforcement Learning and the Eluder Dimensioncited by 116
  11. 2018Lipschitz Continuity in Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 90
  12. 2020The Value Equivalence Principle for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 88
12 more
  1. 2021Spectral Normalisation for Deep Reinforcement Learning: an Optimisation Perspectivecited by 64
  2. 2020Model-Augmented Actor-Critic: Backpropagating through Pathscited by 61
  3. 2019Combating the Compounding-Error Problem with a Multi-step Modelcited by 52
  4. 2017Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Probabilistic Model Predictive Controlcited by 50
  5. 2020Continual Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Hypernetworkscited by 41
  6. 2020Bidirectional Model-based Policy Optimizationcited by 38
  7. 2021Proper Value Equivalencecited by 33
  8. 2020How to Learn a Useful Critic? Model-based Action-Gradient-Estimator Policy Optimizationcited by 16
  9. 2021On Effective Scheduling of Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  10. 2022Plan Your Target and Learn Your Skills: Transferable State-Only Imitation Learning via Decoupled Policy Optimizationcited by 12
  11. 2021On-Policy Model Errors in Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  12. 2021OffCon3: What is state of the art anyway?cited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 7; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025FLARE: Robot Learning with Implicit World Modelingcited by 105
  2. 2024LLM-Empowered State Representation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  3. 2024PRISE: LLM-Style Sequence Compression for Learning Temporal Action Abstractions in Controlcited by 21
  4. 2025Physics-informed Value Learner for Offline Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  5. 2023COPlanner: Plan to Roll Out Conservatively but to Explore Optimistically for Model-Based RLcited by 14
  6. 2024Premier-TACO is a Few-Shot Policy Learner: Pretraining Multitask Representation via Temporal Action-Driven Contrastive Losscited by 10
  7. 2024Any-step Dynamics Model Improves Future Predictions for Online and Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  8. 2023Mind the Model, Not the Agent: The Primacy Bias in Model-based RLcited by 9
  9. 2023Model-Based Reparameterization Policy Gradient Methods: Theory and Practical Algorithmscited by 7
  10. 2025DISCO Balances the Scales: Adaptive Domain- and Difficulty-Aware Reinforcement Learning on Imbalanced Datacited by 6
  11. 2024UVIS: Unsupervised Video Instance Segmentationcited by 5
  12. 2024Stealing That Free Lunch: Exposing the Limits of Dyna-Style Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
7 more
  1. 2024Robust Model Based Reinforcement Learning Using L1 Adaptive Controlcited by 1
  2. 2025Learn A Flexible Exploration Model for Parameterized Action Markov Decision Processescited by 0
  3. 2025Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Reliability-Guaranteed Sequence Modelingcited by 0
  4. 2025Meta-reinforcement learning with minimum attentioncited by 0
  5. 2025A Forensic Analysis of Synthetic Data in RL: Diagnosing and Solving Algorithmic Failures in Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 0
  6. 2026A Pontryagin Method of Model-based Reinforcement Learning via Hamiltonian Actor-Criticcited by 0
  7. 2026In-Distribution Imagination for Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 0