mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Training Normalizing Flows with the Precision-Recall Divergence

arXiv 2302.00628 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative models can have distinct mode of failures like mode dropping and low quality samples, which cannot be captured by a single scalar metric. To address this, recent works propose evaluating generative models using precision and recall, where precision measures quality of samples and recall measures the coverage of the target distribution. Although a variety of discrepancy measures between the target and estimated distribution are used to train generative models, it is unclear what precision-recall trade-offs are achieved by various choices of the discrepancy measures. In this paper, we show that achieving a specified precision-recall trade-off corresponds to minimising -divergences from a family we call the em PR-divergences . Conversely, any -divergence can be written as a linear combination of PR-divergences and therefore correspond to minimising a weighted precision-recall trade-off. Further, we propose a novel generative model that is able to train a normalizing flow to minimise any -divergence, and in particular, achieve a given precision-recall trade-off.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2023.

Builds on

14 of 23 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  2. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  3. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
  4. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  5. 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 925
  6. 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 504
  7. 2018Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recallcited by 401
  8. 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 364
  9. 2019Residual Flows for Invertible Generative Modelingcited by 256
  10. 2022Flow Annealed Importance Sampling Bootstrapcited by 124
  11. 2021Resampling Base Distributions of Normalizing Flowscited by 42
  12. 2020Learning disconnected manifolds: a no GANs landcited by 25
2 more
  1. 2021Latent reweighting, an almost free improvement for GANscited by 6
  2. 2021Bootstrap Your Flowcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.