mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Nearly-Optimal Bound for Fast Regression with ℓ_∞ Guarantee

arXiv 2302.00248 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2023cs.DS cs.LG stat.MLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given a matrix A∈ ℝn× d and a vector b∈ ℝn, we consider the regression problem with ℓ_∞ guarantees: finding a vector x'∈ ℝd such that |x'-x^*|_∞ ≤ fracε√d· |Ax^*-b|2· |A^dagger| where x^*=argminx∈ ℝd|Ax-b|2. One popular approach for solving such ℓ2 regression problem is via sketching: picking a structured random matrix S∈ ℝm× n with mll n and SA can be quickly computed, solve the ``sketched'' regression problem argminx∈ ℝd |SAx-Sb|2. In this paper, we show that in order to obtain such ℓ_∞ guarantee for ℓ2 regression, one has to use sketching matrices that are dense. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first user case in which dense sketching matrices are necessary. On the algorithmic side, we prove that there exists a distribution of dense sketching matrices with m=ε-2dlog3(n/δ) such that solving the sketched regression problem gives the ℓ_∞ guarantee, with probability at least 1-δ. Moreover, the matrix SA can be computed in time O(ndlog n). Our row count is nearly-optimal up to logarithmic factors, and significantly improves the result in [Price, Song and Woodruff, ICALP'17], in which a super-linear in d rows, m=Omega(ε-2d1+γ) for γ=Theta(√fracloglog nlog d) is required. We also develop a novel analytical framework for ℓ_∞ guarantee regression that utilizes the Oblivious Coordinate-wise Embedding (OCE) property introduced in [Song and Yu, ICML'21]. Our analysis is arguably much simpler and more general than [Price, Song and Woodruff, ICALP'17], and it extends to dense sketches for tensor product of vectors.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2023.

Builds on

23 of 50 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebracited by 285
  2. 2018Solving Linear Programs in the Current Matrix Multiplication Timecited by 100
  3. 2021Training Multi-Layer Over-Parametrized Neural Network in Subquadratic Timecited by 62
  4. 2020Training (Overparametrized) Neural Networks in Near-Linear Timecited by 58
  5. 2019Solving Empirical Risk Minimization in the Current Matrix Multiplication Timecited by 53
  6. 2017Relative Error Tensor Low Rank Approximationcited by 45
  7. 2019A Deterministic Linear Program Solver in Current Matrix Multiplication Timecited by 42
  8. 2016Optimality of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemmacited by 41
  9. 2019Gram-Gauss-Newton Method: Learning Overparameterized Neural Networks for Regression Problemscited by 40
  10. 2022A Faster Small Treewidth SDP Solvercited by 36
  11. 2021Fast Sketching of Polynomial Kernels of Polynomial Degreecited by 33
  12. 2017Sketching for Kronecker Product Regression and P-splinescited by 29
11 more
  1. 2019Optimal Sketching for Kronecker Product Regression and Low Rank Approximationcited by 29
  2. 2022Speeding Up Sparsification using Inner Product Search Data Structurescited by 22
  3. 2022Sketching Meets Differential Privacy: Fast Algorithm for Dynamic Kronecker Projection Maintenancecited by 22
  4. 2022Dynamic Tensor Product Regressioncited by 17
  5. 2020Near Input Sparsity Time Kernel Embeddings via Adaptive Samplingcited by 12
  6. 2017Near Optimal Sketching of Low-Rank Tensor Regressioncited by 11
  7. 2022Accelerating Frank-Wolfe Algorithm using Low-Dimensional and Adaptive Data Structurescited by 9
  8. 2017On Using Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices for Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transformscited by 6
  9. 2022Leverage Score Sampling for Tensor Product Matrices in Input Sparsity Timecited by 6
  10. 2022Subquadratic Kronecker Regression with Applications to Tensor Decompositioncited by 6
  11. 2022Optimal Algorithms for Linear Algebra in the Current Matrix Multiplication Timecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: