Inference Time Evidences of Adversarial Attacks for Forensic on Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision Transformers (ViTs) are becoming a very popular paradigm for vision tasks as they achieve state-of-the-art performance on image classification. However, although early works implied that this network structure had increased robustness against adversarial attacks, some works argue ViTs are still vulnerable. This paper presents our first attempt toward detecting adversarial attacks during inference time using the network's input and outputs as well as latent features. We design four quantifications (or derivatives) of input, output, and latent vectors of ViT-based models that provide a signature of the inference, which could be beneficial for the attack detection, and empirically study their behavior over clean samples and adversarial samples. The results demonstrate that the quantifications from input (images) and output (posterior probabilities) are promising for distinguishing clean and adversarial samples, while latent vectors offer less discriminative power, though they give some insights on how adversarial perturbations work.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2023.
Builds on
33 of 39 references.
References · 33
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,584
- 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,096
21 more
- 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
- 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 653
- 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
- 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 208
- 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
- 2021On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examplescited by 167
- 2021Towards Robust Vision Transformercited by 137
- 2021On the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Transformerscited by 104
- 2021Adversarial Robustness Comparison of Vision Transformer and MLP-Mixer to CNNscited by 57
- 2017Efficient Defenses Against Adversarial Attackscited by 53
- 2022Patch-Fool: Are Vision Transformers Always Robust Against Adversarial Perturbations?cited by 47
- 2022Can CNNs Be More Robust Than Transformers?cited by 38
- 2016Early Methods for Detecting Adversarial Imagescited by 36
- 2021SpectralDefense: Detecting Adversarial Attacks on CNNs in the Fourier Domaincited by 30
- 2022ViT-P: Rethinking Data-efficient Vision Transformers from Localitycited by 4
- 2021Learning Defense Transformers for Counterattacking Adversarial Examplescited by 2
- 2021Learning to Detect Adversarial Examples Based on Class Scorescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.