mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Classification Accuracy to Proper Scoring Rules: Elicitability of Probabilistic Top List Predictions

arXiv 2301.11797 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2023stat.ME stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the face of uncertainty, the need for probabilistic assessments has long been recognized in the literature on forecasting. In classification, however, comparative evaluation of classifiers often focuses on predictions specifying a single class through the use of simple accuracy measures, which disregard any probabilistic uncertainty quantification. I propose probabilistic top lists as a novel type of prediction in classification, which bridges the gap between single-class predictions and predictive distributions. The probabilistic top list functional is elicitable through the use of strictly consistent evaluation metrics. The proposed evaluation metrics are based on symmetric proper scoring rules and admit comparison of various types of predictions ranging from single-class point predictions to fully specified predictive distributions. The Brier score yields a metric that is particularly well suited for this kind of comparison.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2023.

Builds on

8 of 28 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2019Multi-Label Image Recognition with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 322
  3. 2019Evaluating model calibration in classificationcited by 168
  4. 2020Evaluation of Neural Architectures Trained with Square Loss vs Cross-Entropy in Classification Taskscited by 138
  5. 2019On the Calibration of Multiclass Classification with Rejectioncited by 41
  6. 2019On the Consistency of Top-k Surrogate Lossescited by 35
  7. 2021Regression Diagnostics meets Forecast Evaluation: Conditional Calibration, Reliability Diagrams, and Coefficient of Determinationcited by 31
  8. 2019Forecast Evaluation of Quantiles, Prediction Intervals, and other Set-Valued Functionalscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

5 papers.