Voting from Nearest Tasks: Meta-Vote Pruning of Pre-trained Models for Downstream Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As a few large-scale pre-trained models become the major choices of various applications, new challenges arise for model pruning, e.g., can we avoid pruning the same model from scratch for every downstream task? How to reuse the pruning results of previous tasks to accelerate the pruning for a new task? To address these challenges, we create a small model for a new task from the pruned models of similar tasks. We show that a few fine-tuning steps on this model suffice to produce a promising pruned-model for the new task. We study this ''meta-pruning'' from nearest tasks on two major classes of pre-trained models, convolutional neural network (CNN) and vision transformer (ViT), under a limited budget of pruning iterations. Our study begins by investigating the overlap of pruned models for similar tasks and how the overlap changes over different layers and blocks. Inspired by these discoveries, we develop a simple but effective ''Meta-Vote Pruning (MVP)'' method that significantly reduces the pruning iterations for a new task by initializing a sub-network from the pruned models of its nearest tasks. In experiments, we demonstrate MVP's advantages in accuracy, efficiency, and generalization through extensive empirical studies and comparisons with popular pruning methods over several datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2023.
Builds on
26 of 53 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
- 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,003
- 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 673
- 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 571
- 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 531
- 2019MetaPruning: Meta Learning for Automatic Neural Network Channel Pruningcited by 226
14 more
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 200
- 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 182
- 2021Patch Slimming for Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 131
- 2019Winning the Lottery with Continuous Sparsificationcited by 99
- 2021Scalable Vision Transformers with Hierarchical Poolingcited by 84
- 2022Unified Visual Transformer Compressioncited by 79
- 2021Vision Transformer Pruningcited by 77
- 2021MEST: Accurate and Fast Memory-Economic Sparse Training Framework on the Edgecited by 77
- 2019Towards Efficient Model Compression via Learned Global Rankingcited by 75
- 2020DHP: Differentiable Meta Pruning via HyperNetworkscited by 57
- 2019Learning Sparse Sharing Architectures for Multiple Taskscited by 31
- 2022Dual Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 27
- 2020Meta-Learning with Network Pruningcited by 14
- 2020Greedy Optimization Provably Wins the Lottery: Logarithmic Number of Winning Tickets is Enoughcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.