mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Returning The Favour: When Regression Benefits From Probabilistic Causal Knowledge

arXiv 2301.11214 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A directed acyclic graph (DAG) provides valuable prior knowledge that is often discarded in regression tasks in machine learning. We show that the independences arising from the presence of collider structures in DAGs provide meaningful inductive biases, which constrain the regression hypothesis space and improve predictive performance. We introduce collider regression, a framework to incorporate probabilistic causal knowledge from a collider in a regression problem. When the hypothesis space is a reproducing kernel Hilbert space, we prove a strictly positive generalisation benefit under mild assumptions and provide closed-form estimators of the empirical risk minimiser. Experiments on synthetic and climate model data demonstrate performance gains of the proposed methodology.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2023.

Builds on

23 of 66 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  3. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
  4. 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
  5. 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 533
  6. 2016Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyondcited by 360
  7. 2018Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalencescited by 188
  8. 2020A Measure-Theoretic Approach to Kernel Conditional Mean Embeddingscited by 86
  9. 2022Optimal Rates for Regularized Conditional Mean Embedding Learningcited by 50
  10. 2013Strong Completeness and Faithfulness in Bayesian Networkscited by 44
  11. 2017Characteristic and Universal Tensor Product Kernelscited by 41
  12. 2017Fair Kernel Learningcited by 39
11 more
  1. 2019A Rigorous Theory of Conditional Mean Embeddingscited by 31
  2. 2021RKHS-SHAP: Shapley Values for Kernel Methodscited by 30
  3. 2021Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Invariance in Kernel Methodscited by 29
  4. 2021Deconditional Downscaling with Gaussian Processescited by 24
  5. 2020Nonparametric approximation of conditional expectation operatorscited by 21
  6. 2022Efficient Conditionally Invariant Representation Learningcited by 19
  7. 2014Kernel Mean Shrinkage Estimatorscited by 16
  8. 2019Kernel Dependence Regularizers and Gaussian Processes with Applications to Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 16
  9. 2019Noise Contrastive Meta-Learning for Conditional Density Estimation using Kernel Mean Embeddingscited by 10
  10. 2019Bayesian Deconditional Kernel Mean Embeddingscited by 6
  11. 2022Doubly Robust Kernel Statistics for Testing Distributional Treatment Effectscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.