Inspecting class hierarchies in classification-based metric learning models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most classification models treat all misclassifications equally. However, different classes may be related, and these hierarchical relationships must be considered in some classification problems. These problems can be addressed by using hierarchical information during training. Unfortunately, this information is not available for all datasets. Many classification-based metric learning methods use class representatives in embedding space to represent different classes. The relationships among the learned class representatives can then be used to estimate class hierarchical structures. If we have a predefined class hierarchy, the learned class representatives can be assessed to determine whether the metric learning model learned semantic distances that match our prior knowledge. In this work, we train a softmax classifier and three metric learning models with several training options on benchmark and real-world datasets. In addition to the standard classification accuracy, we evaluate the hierarchical inference performance by inspecting learned class representatives and the hierarchy-informed performance, i.e., the classification performance, and the metric learning performance by considering predefined hierarchical structures. Furthermore, we investigate how the considered measures are affected by various models and training options. When our proposed ProxyDR model is trained without using predefined hierarchical structures, the hierarchical inference performance is significantly better than that of the popular NormFace model. Additionally, our model enhances some hierarchy-informed performance measures under the same training options. We also found that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with random weights correspond to the predefined hierarchies better than random chance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2023.
Builds on
20 of 35 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
- 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 968
- 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 733
- 2019A Closer Look at Few-shot Classificationcited by 679
- 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 317
- 2017NormFace: L2 Hypersphere Embedding for Face Verificationcited by 237
8 more
- 2017No Fuss Distance Metric Learning using Proxiescited by 225
- 2020Proxy Anchor Loss for Deep Metric Learningcited by 195
- 2019Making Better Mistakes: Leveraging Class Hierarchies with Deep Networkscited by 112
- 2019AdaCos: Adaptively Scaling Cosine Logits for Effectively Learning Deep Face Representationscited by 83
- 2018Hierarchy-based Image Embeddings for Semantic Image Retrievalcited by 41
- 2020Leveraging Class Hierarchies with Metric-Guided Prototype Learningcited by 20
- 2021Ontology-based n-ball Concept Embeddings Informing Few-shot Image Classificationcited by 4
- 2022Distance-Ratio-Based Formulation for Metric Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.