mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dataset Bias in Human Activity Recognition

arXiv 2301.10161 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2023eess.SP cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When creating multi-channel time-series datasets for Human Activity Recognition (HAR), researchers are faced with the issue of subject selection criteria. It is unknown what physical characteristics and/or soft-biometrics, such as age, height, and weight, need to be taken into account to train a classifier to achieve robustness towards heterogeneous populations in the training and testing data. This contribution statistically curates the training data to assess to what degree the physical characteristics of humans influence HAR performance. We evaluate the performance of a state-of-the-art convolutional neural network on two HAR datasets that vary in the sensors, activities, and recording for time-series HAR. The training data is intentionally biased with respect to human characteristics to determine the features that impact motion behaviour. The evaluations brought forth the impact of the subjects' characteristics on HAR. Thus, providing insights regarding the robustness of the classifier with respect to heterogeneous populations. The study is a step forward in the direction of fair and trustworthy artificial intelligence by attempting to quantify representation bias in multi-channel time series HAR data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2023.

Builds on

2 of 21 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasetscited by 136
  2. 2020Personalization in Human Activity Recognitioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.