Model soups to increase inference without increasing compute time
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we compare Model Soups performances on three different models (ResNet, ViT and EfficientNet) using three Soup Recipes (Greedy Soup Sorted, Greedy Soup Random and Uniform soup) from arXiv:2203.05482, and reproduce the results of the authors. We then introduce a new Soup Recipe called Pruned Soup. Results from the soups were better than the best individual model for the pre-trained vision transformer, but were much worst for the ResNet and the EfficientNet. Our pruned soup performed better than the uniform and greedy soups presented in the original paper. We also discuss the limitations of weight-averaging that were found during the experiments. The code for our model soup library and the experiments with different models can be found here: https://github.com/milo-sobral/ModelSoup
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2023.
Builds on
4 of 6 references.
References · 4
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
Built on by
Not cited yet.