Representing Interlingual Meaning in Lexical Databases
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In today's multilingual lexical databases, the majority of the world's languages are under-represented. Beyond a mere issue of resource incompleteness, we show that existing lexical databases have structural limitations that result in a reduced expressivity on culturally-specific words and in mapping them across languages. In particular, the lexical meaning space of dominant languages, such as English, is represented more accurately while linguistically or culturally diverse languages are mapped in an approximate manner. Our paper assesses state-of-the-art multilingual lexical databases and evaluates their strengths and limitations with respect to their expressivity on lexical phenomena of linguistic diversity.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2023.
Builds on
3 of 49 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Towards Bridging the Digital Language Dividecited by 7
- 2023Diversity and Language Technology: How Techno-Linguistic Bias Can Cause Epistemic Injusticecited by 4
- 2024Crowdsourcing Lexical Diversitycited by 1
- 2026Plurification in/of language technology -- The integration of culture in next-generation AIcited by 0
- 2026Plurification in/of language technology -- The integration of culture in next-generation AI20 Jun 2026
- 2024Crowdsourcing Lexical Diversity30 Oct 2024
- 2023Diversity and Language Technology: How Techno-Linguistic Bias Can Cause Epistemic Injustice25 Jul 2023
- 2023Towards Bridging the Digital Language Divide25 Jul 2023