mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Representing Interlingual Meaning in Lexical Databases

arXiv 2301.09169 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In today's multilingual lexical databases, the majority of the world's languages are under-represented. Beyond a mere issue of resource incompleteness, we show that existing lexical databases have structural limitations that result in a reduced expressivity on culturally-specific words and in mapping them across languages. In particular, the lexical meaning space of dominant languages, such as English, is represented more accurately while linguistically or culturally diverse languages are mapped in an approximate manner. Our paper assesses state-of-the-art multilingual lexical databases and evaluates their strengths and limitations with respect to their expressivity on lexical phenomena of linguistic diversity.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2023.

Builds on

3 of 49 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022Using Linguistic Typology to Enrich Multilingual Lexicons: the Case of Lexical Gaps in Kinshipcited by 9
  2. 2022Language Diversity: Visible to Humans, Exploitable by Machinescited by 8
  3. 2022Indian Language Wordnets and their Linkages with Princeton WordNetcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.