Statistical Theory of Differentially Private Marginal-based Data Synthesis Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Marginal-based methods achieve promising performance in the synthetic data competition hosted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). To deal with high-dimensional data, the distribution of synthetic data is represented by a probabilistic graphical model (e.g., a Bayesian network), while the raw data distribution is approximated by a collection of low-dimensional marginals. Differential privacy (DP) is guaranteed by introducing random noise to each low-dimensional marginal distribution. Despite its promising performance in practice, the statistical properties of marginal-based methods are rarely studied in the literature. In this paper, we study DP data synthesis algorithms based on Bayesian networks (BN) from a statistical perspective. We establish a rigorous accuracy guarantee for BN-based algorithms, where the errors are measured by the total variation (TV) distance or the L2 distance. Related to downstream machine learning tasks, an upper bound for the utility error of the DP synthetic data is also derived. To complete the picture, we establish a lower bound for TV accuracy that holds for every ε-DP synthetic data generator.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2023.
Builds on
8 of 37 references.
References · 8
- 2017Real-valued (Medical) Time Series Generation with Recurrent Conditional GANscited by 329
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
- 2021Winning the NIST Contest: A scalable and general approach to differentially private synthetic datacited by 101
- 2019Graphical-model based estimation and inference for differential privacycited by 73
- 2017Tight Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Selectioncited by 33
- 2016Collecting and Analyzing Data from Smart Device Users with Local Differential Privacycited by 25
- 2013Efficient Algorithms for Privately Releasing Marginals via Convex Relaxationscited by 17
- 2018Measuring the quality of Synthetic data for use in competitionscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024A Survey on Statistical Theory of Deep Learning: Approximation, Training Dynamics, and Generative Modelscited by 20
- 2023Graphical vs. Deep Generative Models: Measuring the Impact of Differentially Private Mechanisms and Budgets on Utilitycited by 13
- 2023Unified Enhancement of Privacy Bounds for Mixture Mechanisms via f-Differential Privacycited by 13
- 2023Utility Theory of Synthetic Data Generationcited by 8
- 2024Neural Collapse Meets Differential Privacy: Curious Behaviors of NoisyGD with Near-perfect Representation Learningcited by 8
- 2024Bounding the Excess Risk for Linear Models Trained on Marginal-Preserving, Differentially-Private, Synthetic Datacited by 3
- 2025PrAda-GAN: A Private Adaptive Generative Adversarial Network with Bayes Network Structurecited by 1
- 2025PrAda-GAN: A Private Adaptive Generative Adversarial Network with Bayes Network Structure11 Nov 2025
- 2024Neural Collapse Meets Differential Privacy: Curious Behaviors of NoisyGD with Near-perfect Representation Learning14 May 2024
- 2024Bounding the Excess Risk for Linear Models Trained on Marginal-Preserving, Differentially-Private, Synthetic Data6 Feb 2024
- 2024A Survey on Statistical Theory of Deep Learning: Approximation, Training Dynamics, and Generative Models14 Jan 2024
- 2023Unified Enhancement of Privacy Bounds for Mixture Mechanisms via f-Differential Privacy30 Oct 2023
- 2023Graphical vs. Deep Generative Models: Measuring the Impact of Differentially Private Mechanisms and Budgets on Utility18 May 2023
- 2023Utility Theory of Synthetic Data Generation17 May 2023