mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MV-Adapter: Multimodal Video Transfer Learning for Video Text Retrieval

arXiv 2301.07868 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2023cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

State-of-the-art video-text retrieval (VTR) methods typically involve fully fine-tuning a pre-trained model (e.g. CLIP) on specific datasets. However, this can result in significant storage costs in practical applications as a separate model per task must be stored. To address this issue, we present our pioneering work that enables parameter-efficient VTR using a pre-trained model, with only a small number of tunable parameters during training. Towards this goal, we propose a new method dubbed Multimodal Video Adapter (MV-Adapter) for efficiently transferring the knowledge in the pre-trained CLIP from image-text to video-text. Specifically, MV-Adapter utilizes bottleneck structures in both video and text branches, along with two novel components. The first is a Temporal Adaptation Module that is incorporated in the video branch to introduce global and local temporal contexts. We also train weights calibrations to adjust to dynamic variations across frames. The second is Cross Modality Tying that generates weights for video/text branches through sharing cross modality factors, for better aligning between modalities. Thanks to above innovations, MV-Adapter can achieve comparable or better performance than standard full fine-tuning with negligible parameters overhead. Notably, MV-Adapter consistently outperforms various competing methods in V2T/T2V tasks with large margins on five widely used VTR benchmarks (MSR-VTT, MSVD, LSMDC, DiDemo, and ActivityNet).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2023.

Builds on

24 of 49 references.

References · 24

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
  5. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  6. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  7. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  8. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  9. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  10. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
  11. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
  12. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 863
12 more
  1. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 802
  2. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
  3. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 714
  4. 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 458
  5. 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 377
  6. 2020Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruningcited by 351
  7. 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
  8. 2022ST-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Image-to-Video Transfer Learningcited by 192
  9. 2019To Tune or Not to Tune? Adapting Pretrained Representations to Diverse Taskscited by 167
  10. 2022Convolutional Bypasses Are Better Vision Transformer Adapterscited by 120
  11. 2022Disentangled Representation Learning for Text-Video Retrievalcited by 77
  12. 2022Tencent Text-Video Retrieval: Hierarchical Cross-Modal Interactions with Multi-Level Representationscited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.