mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Warning: Humans Cannot Reliably Detect Speech Deepfakes

arXiv 2301.07829 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2023cs.HC cs.SD eess.AScited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Speech deepfakes are artificial voices generated by machine learning models. Previous literature has highlighted deepfakes as one of the biggest security threats arising from progress in artificial intelligence due to their potential for misuse. However, studies investigating human detection capabilities are limited. We presented genuine and deepfake audio to n = 529 individuals and asked them to identify the deepfakes. We ran our experiments in English and Mandarin to understand if language affects detection performance and decision-making rationale. We found that detection capability is unreliable. Listeners only correctly spotted the deepfakes 73% of the time, and there was no difference in detectability between the two languages. Increasing listener awareness by providing examples of speech deepfakes only improves results slightly. As speech synthesis algorithms improve and become more realistic, we can expect the detection task to become harder. The difficulty of detecting speech deepfakes confirms their potential for misuse and signals that defenses against this threat are needed.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 9; 2025: 1; 2026: 10.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  2. 2024As Good As A Coin Toss: Human detection of AI-generated images, videos, audio, and audiovisual stimulicited by 22
  3. 2025Speech DF Arena: A Leaderboard for Speech DeepFake Detection Modelscited by 20
  4. 2024People are poorly equipped to detect AI-powered voice clonescited by 12
  5. 2024Non-Consensual Synthetic Intimate Imagery: Prevalence, Attitudes, and Knowledge in 10 Countriescited by 8
  6. 2024Unmasking Illusions: Understanding Human Perception of Audiovisual Deepfakescited by 7
  7. 2024Text-To-Speech Synthesis In The Wildcited by 6
  8. 2024Deepfakes and Higher Education: A Research Agenda and Scoping Review of Synthetic Mediacited by 4
  9. 2024RU-AI: A Large Multimodal Dataset for Machine-Generated Content Detectioncited by 4
  10. 2026Disentangling Speaker Traits for Deepfake Source Verification via Chebyshev Polynomial and Riemannian Metric Learningcited by 1
  11. 2024Linguistic traces of stochastic empathy in language modelscited by 0
  12. 2026Acoustic and perceptual differences between standard and accented speech and their voice clonescited by 0
8 more
  1. 2026V.O.I.C.E (Voice, Ownership, Identity, Control, Expression): Risk Taxonomy of Synthetic Voice Generation From Empirical Datacited by 0
  2. 2026Voice "Cloning" is Style Transfercited by 0
  3. 2026Eroding Trust in Real Speech: A Large-Scale Study of Human Audio Deepfake Perceptioncited by 0
  4. 2026Half-Truth Audio Detection and Localisation: A Lightweight Cross-Attentive Architecture and a Cross-Corpus Diagnostic Studycited by 0
  5. 2026What You Train Is What You Get: Gender Bias, Training Composition, and Post-Hoc Mitigation in Audio Deepfake Detectioncited by 0
  6. 2026The Voiceprint Fallacy: Why Voices Are Not Unique Biometric Imprintscited by 0
  7. 2026A survey of AI-generated voices and their detectioncited by 0
  8. 2026GLAD: Global-Local Adaptive Detector for Robust Speech Deepfake Detectioncited by 0