Generative Adversarial Networks to infer velocity components in rotating turbulent flows
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Inference problems for two-dimensional snapshots of rotating turbulent flows are studied. We perform a systematic quantitative benchmark of point-wise and statistical reconstruction capabilities of the linear Extended Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (EPOD) method, a non-linear Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN). We attack the important task of inferring one velocity component out of the measurement of a second one, and two cases are studied: (I) both components lay in the plane orthogonal to the rotation axis and (II) one of the two is parallel to the rotation axis. We show that EPOD method works well only for the former case where both components are strongly correlated, while CNN and GAN always outperform EPOD both concerning point-wise and statistical reconstructions. For case (II), when the input and output data are weakly correlated, all methods fail to reconstruct faithfully the point-wise information. In this case, only GAN is able to reconstruct the field in a statistical sense. The analysis is performed using both standard validation tools based on L2 spatial distance between the prediction and the ground truth and more sophisticated multi-scale analysis using wavelet decomposition. Statistical validation is based on standard Jensen-Shannon divergence between the probability density functions, spectral properties and multi-scale flatness.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2023.
Builds on
10 of 53 references.
References · 10
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,424
- 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 504
- 2020Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantitiescited by 46
- 2018Missing Data Reconstruction in Remote Sensing image with a Unified Spatial-Temporal-Spectral Deep Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 26
- 2020Turbulence Enrichment using Physics-informed Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 18
- 2020Reconstruction of turbulent data with deep generative models for semantic inpainting from TURB-Rot databasecited by 17
- 2020TURB-Rot. A large database of 3d and 2d snapshots from turbulent rotating flowscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023Turbulence Scaling from Deep Learning Diffusion Generative Modelscited by 8
- 2025Diff-SPORT: Diffusion-based Sensor Placement Optimization and Reconstruction of Turbulent flows in urban environmentscited by 8
- 2025Learning Turbulent Flows with Generative Models: Super-resolution, Forecasting, and Sparse Flow Reconstructioncited by 7
- 2023A multiscale and multicriteria Generative Adversarial Network to synthesize 1-dimensional turbulent fieldscited by 2
- 2024Stochastic Reconstruction of Gappy Lagrangian Turbulent Signals by Conditional Diffusion Modelscited by 1
- 2025Learning Turbulent Flows with Generative Models: Super-resolution, Forecasting, and Sparse Flow Reconstruction10 Sep 2025
- 2025Diff-SPORT: Diffusion-based Sensor Placement Optimization and Reconstruction of Turbulent flows in urban environments30 May 2025
- 2024Stochastic Reconstruction of Gappy Lagrangian Turbulent Signals by Conditional Diffusion Models31 Oct 2024
- 2023Turbulence Scaling from Deep Learning Diffusion Generative Models10 Nov 2023
- 2023A multiscale and multicriteria Generative Adversarial Network to synthesize 1-dimensional turbulent fields31 Jul 2023