mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Risk Prediction to Risk Factors Interpretation. Comparison of Neural Networks and Classical Statistics for Dementia Prediction

arXiv 2301.06995 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2023stat.AP stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is proposed to investigate the onset of a disease D, based on several risk factors., with a specific interest in Alzheimer occurrence. For that purpose, two classes of techniques are available, whose properties are quite different in terms of interpretation, which is the focus of this paper: classical statistics based on probabilistic models and artificial intelligence (mainly neural networks) based on optimization algorithms. Both methods are good at prediction, with a preference for neural networks when the dimension of the potential predictors is high. But the advantage of the classical statistics is cognitive : the role of each factor is generally summarized in the value of a coefficient which is highly positive for a harmful factor, close to 0 for an irrelevant one, and highly negative for a beneficial one.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2023.

Builds on

3 of 22 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016DeepSurv: Personalized Treatment Recommender System Using A Cox Proportional Hazards Deep Neural Networkcited by 358
  3. 2021Deep learning: a statistical viewpointcited by 240

Built on by

Not cited yet.