mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptive Depth Graph Attention Networks

arXiv 2301.06265 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As one of the most popular GNN architectures, the graph attention networks (GAT) is considered the most advanced learning architecture for graph representation and has been widely used in various graph mining tasks with impressive results. However, since GAT was proposed, none of the existing studies have provided systematic insight into the relationship between the performance of GAT and the number of layers, which is a critical issue in guiding model performance improvement. In this paper, we perform a systematic experimental evaluation and based on the experimental results, we find two important facts: (1) the main factor limiting the accuracy of the GAT model as the number of layers increases is the oversquashing phenomenon; (2) among the previous improvements applied to the GNN model, only the residual connection can significantly improve the GAT model performance. We combine these two important findings to provide a theoretical explanation that it is the residual connection that mitigates the loss of original feature information due to oversquashing and thus improves the deep GAT model performance. This provides empirical insights and guidelines for researchers to design the GAT variant model with appropriate depth and well performance. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed guidelines, we propose a GAT variant model-ADGAT that adaptively selects the number of layers based on the sparsity of the graph, and experimentally demonstrate that the effectiveness of our model is significantly improved over the original GAT.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2023.

Builds on

26 of 38 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
  5. 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,470
  6. 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,099
  7. 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 987
  8. 2018Representation Learning on Graphs with Jumping Knowledge Networkscited by 875
  9. 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 857
  10. 2019Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendationcited by 711
  11. 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 624
  12. 2019DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go as Deep as CNNs?cited by 527
14 more
  1. 2020Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 493
  2. 2019PairNorm: Tackling Oversmoothing in GNNscited by 297
  3. 2020SIGN: Scalable Inception Graph Neural Networkscited by 283
  4. 2020A Note on Over-Smoothing for Graph Neural Networkscited by 245
  5. 2021Two Sides of the Same Coin: Heterophily and Oversmoothing in Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 182
  6. 2020Directional Graph Networkscited by 132
  7. 2019Attributed Graph Clustering via Adaptive Graph Convolutioncited by 96
  8. 2017Geometric Matrix Completion with Recurrent Multi-Graph Neural Networkscited by 88
  9. 2020Scattering GCN: Overcoming Oversmoothness in Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 57
  10. 2020Revisiting Over-smoothing in Deep GCNscited by 55
  11. 2021Knowledge-aware Coupled Graph Neural Network for Social Recommendationcited by 49
  12. 2021Lipschitz Normalization for Self-Attention Layers with Application to Graph Neural Networkscited by 38
  13. 2021Evaluating Deep Graph Neural Networkscited by 19
  14. 2022Feature Overcorrelation in Deep Graph Neural Networks: A New Perspectivecited by 19

Built on by

Not cited yet.