LZR: Identifying Unexpected Internet Services
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Internet-wide scanning is a commonly used research technique that has helped uncover real-world attacks, find cryptographic weaknesses, and understand both operator and miscreant behavior. Studies that employ scanning have largely assumed that services are hosted on their IANA-assigned ports, overlooking the study of services on unusual ports. In this work, we investigate where Internet services are deployed in practice and evaluate the security posture of services on unexpected ports. We show protocol deployment is more diffuse than previously believed and that protocols run on many additional ports beyond their primary IANA-assigned port. For example, only 3% of HTTP and 6% of TLS services run on ports 80 and 443, respectively. Services on non-standard ports are more likely to be insecure, which results in studies dramatically underestimating the security posture of Internet hosts. Building on our observations, we introduce LZR ("Laser"), a system that identifies 99% of identifiable unexpected services in five handshakes and dramatically reduces the time needed to perform application-layer scans on ports with few responsive expected services (e.g., 5500% speedup on 27017/MongoDB). We conclude with recommendations for future studies.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024Detection Latencies of Anomaly Detectors: An Overlooked Perspective ?cited by 1
- 2023Predicting IPv4 Services Across All Portscited by 0
- 2024Detection Latencies of Anomaly Detectors: An Overlooked Perspective ?14 Feb 2024
- 2023Predicting IPv4 Services Across All Ports2 Mar 2023