mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Space-Query Tradeoffs in Range Subgraph Counting and Listing

arXiv 2301.03390 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2023cs.DS cs.DBcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper initializes the study of em range subgraph counting and em range subgraph listing, both of which are motivated by the significant demands in practice to perform graph analytics on subgraphs pertinent to only selected, as opposed to all, vertices. In the first problem, there is an undirected graph G where each vertex carries a real-valued attribute. Given an interval q and a pattern Q, a query counts the number of occurrences of Q in the subgraph of G induced by the vertices whose attributes fall in q. The second problem has the same setup except that a query needs to enumerate (rather than count) those occurrences with a small delay. In both problems, our goal is to understand the tradeoff between em space usage and em query cost, or more specifically: (i) given a target on query efficiency, how much pre-computed information about G must we store? (ii) Or conversely, given a budget on space usage, what is the best query time we can hope for? We establish a suite of upper- and lower-bound results on such tradeoffs for various query patterns.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.