Classifying Mental-Disorders through Clinicians Subjective Approach based on Three-way Decision
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In psychiatric diagnosis, a contemporary data-driven, manual-based method for mental disorders classification is the most popular technique; however, it has several inevitable flaws. Using the three-way decision as a framework, we propose a unified model that stands for clinicians' subjective approach (CSA) analysis consisting of three parts: quantitative analysis, quantitative analysis, and evaluation-based analysis. A ranking list and a set of numerical weights based on illness magnitude levels according to the clinician's greatest degree of assumptions are the findings of the qualitative and quantitative investigation. We further create a comparative classification of illnesses into three groups with varying important levels; a three-way evaluation-based model is utilized in this study for the aim of understanding and portraying these results in a more clear way. This proposed method might be integrated with the manual-based process as a complementary tool to improve precision while diagnosing mental disorders
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2022.
Builds on
0 of 49 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.