Analyzing the Representational Geometry of Acoustic Word Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Acoustic word embeddings (AWEs) are vector representations such that different acoustic exemplars of the same word are projected nearby in the embedding space. In addition to their use in speech technology applications such as spoken term discovery and keyword spotting, AWE models have been adopted as models of spoken-word processing in several cognitively motivated studies and have been shown to exhibit human-like performance in some auditory processing tasks. Nevertheless, the representational geometry of AWEs remains an under-explored topic that has not been studied in the literature. In this paper, we take a closer analytical look at AWEs learned from English speech and study how the choice of the learning objective and the architecture shapes their representational profile. To this end, we employ a set of analytic techniques from machine learning and neuroscience in three different analyses: embedding space uniformity, word discriminability, and representational consistency. Our main findings highlight the prominent role of the learning objective on shaping the representation profile compared to the model architecture.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2023.
Builds on
22 of 46 references.
References · 22
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 205
- 2021IsoScore: Measuring the Uniformity of Embedding Space Utilizationcited by 52
- 2018Truly unsupervised acoustic word embeddings using weak top-down constraints in encoder-decoder modelscited by 29
- 2015Deep convolutional acoustic word embeddings using word-pair side informationcited by 27
- 2016Discriminative Acoustic Word Embeddings: Recurrent Neural Network-Based Approachescited by 25
10 more
- 2020Evaluating the reliability of acoustic speech embeddingscited by 21
- 2021Acoustic word embeddings for zero-resource languages using self-supervised contrastive learning and multilingual adaptationcited by 19
- 2019Acoustically Grounded Word Embeddings for Improved Acoustics-to-Word Speech Recognitioncited by 15
- 2021Leveraging pre-trained representations to improve access to untranscribed speech from endangered languagescited by 8
- 2021Do Acoustic Word Embeddings Capture Phonological Similarity? An Empirical Studycited by 8
- 2021How Familiar Does That Sound? Cross-Lingual Representational Similarity Analysis of Acoustic Word Embeddingscited by 8
- 2020Analyzing autoencoder-based acoustic word embeddingscited by 7
- 2021A phonetic model of non-native spoken word processingcited by 5
- 2017Word forms - not just their lengths- are optimized for efficient communicationcited by 2
- 2022Inferring exemplar discriminability in brain representationscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.