Optimal lower bounds for Quantum Learning via Information Theory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Although a concept class may be learnt more efficiently using quantum samples as compared with classical samples in certain scenarios, Arunachalam and de Wolf (JMLR, 2018) proved that quantum learners are asymptotically no more efficient than classical ones in the quantum PAC and Agnostic learning models. They established lower bounds on sample complexity via quantum state identification and Fourier analysis. In this paper, we derive optimal lower bounds for quantum sample complexity in both the PAC and agnostic models via an information-theoretic approach. The proofs are arguably simpler, and the same ideas can potentially be used to derive optimal bounds for other problems in quantum learning theory. We then turn to a quantum analogue of the Coupon Collector problem, a classic problem from probability theory also of importance in the study of PAC learning. Arunachalam, Belovs, Childs, Kothari, Rosmanis, and de Wolf (TQC, 2020) characterized the quantum sample complexity of this problem up to constant factors. First, we show that the information-theoretic approach mentioned above provably does not yield the optimal lower bound. As a by-product, we get a natural ensemble of pure states in arbitrarily high dimensions which are not easily (simultaneously) distinguishable, while the ensemble has close to maximal Holevo information. Second, we discover that the information-theoretic approach yields an asymptotically optimal bound for an approximation variant of the problem. Finally, we derive a sharper lower bound for the Quantum Coupon Collector problem, via the generalized Holevo-Curlander bounds on the distinguishability of an ensemble. All the aspects of the Quantum Coupon Collector problem we study rest on properties of the spectrum of the associated Gram matrix, which may be of independent interest.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2023.
Builds on
3 of 34 references.
References · 3
- 2021Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training datacited by 214
- 2015The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learningcited by 72
- 2016Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Algorithmscited by 32
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Classical Verification of Quantum Learningcited by 6
- 2023Quantum Learning Theory Beyond Batch Binary Classificationcited by 3
- 2024Proper vs Improper Quantum PAC learningcited by 0
- 2026The Quantum Learning Menagerie (A survey on Quantum learning for Classical concepts)cited by 0
- 2026The Quantum Learning Menagerie (A survey on Quantum learning for Classical concepts)1 Feb 2026
- 2024Proper vs Improper Quantum PAC learning5 Mar 2024
- 2023Classical Verification of Quantum Learning8 Jun 2023
- 2023Quantum Learning Theory Beyond Batch Binary Classification15 Feb 2023