mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Critical Appraisal of Data Augmentation Methods for Imaging-Based Medical Diagnosis Applications

arXiv 2301.02181 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current data augmentation techniques and transformations are well suited for improving the size and quality of natural image datasets but are not yet optimized for medical imaging. We hypothesize that sub-optimal data augmentations can easily distort or occlude medical images, leading to false positives or negatives during patient diagnosis, prediction, or therapy/surgery evaluation. In our experimental results, we found that utilizing commonly used intensity-based data augmentation distorts the MRI scans and leads to texture information loss, thus negatively affecting the overall performance of classification. Additionally, we observed that commonly used data augmentation methods cannot be used with a plug-and-play approach in medical imaging, and requires manual tuning and adjustment.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2022.

Builds on

5 of 6 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  2. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  3. 2020ResNeSt: Split-Attention Networkscited by 445
  4. 2019Fast AutoAugmentcited by 243
  5. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 225

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.