Critical Perspectives: A Benchmark Revealing Pitfalls in PerspectiveAPI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detecting "toxic" language in internet content is a pressing social and technical challenge. In this work, we focus on PERSPECTIVE from Jigsaw, a state-of-the-art tool that promises to score the "toxicity" of text, with a recent model update that claims impressive results (Lees et al., 2022). We seek to challenge certain normative claims about toxic language by proposing a new benchmark, Selected Adversarial SemanticS, or SASS. We evaluate PERSPECTIVE on SASS, and compare to low-effort alternatives, like zero-shot and few-shot GPT-3 prompt models, in binary classification settings. We find that PERSPECTIVE exhibits troubling shortcomings across a number of our toxicity categories. SASS provides a new tool for evaluating performance on previously undetected toxic language that avoids common normative pitfalls. Our work leads us to emphasize the importance of questioning assumptions made by tools already in deployment for toxicity detection in order to anticipate and prevent disparate harms.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2023.
Builds on
13 of 36 references.
References · 13
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
- 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
- 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 217
- 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 215
- 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 208
- 2022A New Generation of Perspective API: Efficient Multilingual Character-level Transformerscited by 181
- 2017Deceiving Google's Perspective API Built for Detecting Toxic Commentscited by 99
- 2018All You Need is "Love": Evading Hate-speech Detectioncited by 56
- 2017Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussionscited by 30
- 2019Towards Robust Toxic Content Classificationcited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024Safeguarding Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 73
- 2024Testing the Limits of Jailbreaking Defenses with the Purple Problemcited by 8
- 2025Guardians and Offenders: A Survey on Harmful Content Generation and Safety Mitigation of LLMcited by 8
- 2024The Monetisation of Toxicity: Analysing YouTube Content Creators and Controversy-Driven Engagementcited by 3
- 2025Something Just Like TRuST : Toxicity Recognition of Span and Targetcited by 2
- 2024Characterization of Political Polarized Users Attacked by Language Toxicity on Twittercited by 1
- 2025Guardians and Offenders: A Survey on Harmful Content Generation and Safety Mitigation of LLM7 Aug 2025
- 2025Something Just Like TRuST : Toxicity Recognition of Span and Target2 Jun 2025
- 2024The Monetisation of Toxicity: Analysing YouTube Content Creators and Controversy-Driven Engagement1 Aug 2024
- 2024Characterization of Political Polarized Users Attacked by Language Toxicity on Twitter17 Jul 2024
- 2024Safeguarding Large Language Models: A Survey3 Jun 2024
- 2024Testing the Limits of Jailbreaking Defenses with the Purple Problem20 Mar 2024