The E-Posterior
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We develop a representation of a decision maker's uncertainty based on e-variables. Like the Bayesian posterior, this *e-posterior* allows for making predictions against arbitrary loss functions that may not be specified ex ante. Unlike the Bayesian posterior, it provides risk bounds that have frequentist validity irrespective of prior adequacy: if the e-collection (which plays a role analogous to the Bayesian prior) is chosen badly, the bounds get loose rather than wrong, making *e-posterior minimax* decision rules safer than Bayesian ones. The resulting *quasi-conditional paradigm* is illustrated by re-interpreting a previous influential partial Bayes-frequentist unification, *Kiefer-Berger-Brown-Wolpert conditional frequentist tests*, in terms of e-posteriors.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Protected Test-Time Adaptation via Online Entropy Matching: A Betting Approachcited by 22
- 2023Improved Algorithms for Stochastic Linear Bandits Using Tail Bounds for Martingale Mixturescited by 12
- 2024Meta-Analysis with Untrusted Datacited by 2
- 2025Fuzzy Prediction Sets: Conformal Prediction with E-valuescited by 2
- 2025Fuzzy Prediction Sets: Conformal Prediction with E-values16 Sep 2025
- 2024Protected Test-Time Adaptation via Online Entropy Matching: A Betting Approach14 Aug 2024
- 2024Meta-Analysis with Untrusted Data12 Jul 2024
- 2023Improved Algorithms for Stochastic Linear Bandits Using Tail Bounds for Martingale Mixtures25 Sep 2023