Graphical House Allocation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The classical house allocation problem involves assigning n houses (or items) to n agents according to their preferences. A key criterion in such problems is satisfying some fairness constraints such as envy-freeness. We consider a generalization of this problem wherein the agents are placed along the vertices of a graph (corresponding to a social network), and each agent can only experience envy towards its neighbors. Our goal is to minimize the aggregate envy among the agents as a natural fairness objective, i.e., the sum of all pairwise envy values over all edges in a social graph. When agents have identical and evenly-spaced valuations, our problem reduces to the well-studied problem of linear arrangements. For identical valuations with possibly uneven spacing, we show a number of deep and surprising ways in which our setting is a departure from this classical problem. More broadly, we contribute several structural and computational results for various classes of graphs, including NP-hardness results for disjoint unions of paths, cycles, stars, or cliques, and fixed-parameter tractable (and, in some cases, polynomial-time) algorithms for paths, cycles, stars, cliques, and their disjoint unions. Additionally, a conceptual contribution of our work is the formulation of a structural property for disconnected graphs that we call separability which results in efficient parameterized algorithms for finding optimal allocations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2023.
Builds on
7 of 42 references.
References · 7
- 2016Fair Division via Social Comparisoncited by 5
- 2019Envy-Freeness in House Allocation Problemscited by 5
- 2019Envy-free Matchings in Bipartite Graphs and their Applications to Fair Divisioncited by 4
- 2020Envy-Free Allocations Respecting Social Networkscited by 3
- 2019Graphical One-Sided Marketscited by 1
- 2021On the Complexity of Fair House Allocationcited by 1
- 2022Reforming an Envy-Free Matchingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.