mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Comparative Study of Image Disguising Methods for Confidential Outsourced Learning

arXiv 2301.00252 ↗First posted 31 Dec 2022cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large training data and expensive model tweaking are standard features of deep learning for images. As a result, data owners often utilize cloud resources to develop large-scale complex models, which raises privacy concerns. Existing solutions are either too expensive to be practical or do not sufficiently protect the confidentiality of data and models. In this paper, we study and compare novel image disguising mechanisms, DisguisedNets and InstaHide, aiming to achieve a better trade-off among the level of protection for outsourced DNN model training, the expenses, and the utility of data. DisguisedNets are novel combinations of image blocktization, block-level random permutation, and two block-level secure transformations: random multidimensional projection (RMT) and AES pixel-level encryption (AES). InstaHide is an image mixup and random pixel flipping technique citehuang20. We have analyzed and evaluated them under a multi-level threat model. RMT provides a better security guarantee than InstaHide, under the Level-1 adversarial knowledge with well-preserved model quality. In contrast, AES provides a security guarantee under the Level-2 adversarial knowledge, but it may affect model quality more. The unique features of image disguising also help us to protect models from model-targeted attacks. We have done an extensive experimental evaluation to understand how these methods work in different settings for different datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2022.

Builds on

16 of 41 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  3. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  4. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
  5. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
  6. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
  7. 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
  8. 2019The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networkscited by 241
  9. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 208
  10. 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
  11. 2018Slalom: Fast, Verifiable and Private Execution of Neural Networks in Trusted Hardwarecited by 101
  12. 2020InstaHide: Instance-hiding Schemes for Private Distributed Learningcited by 90
4 more
  1. 2020CrypTFlow2: Practical 2-Party Secure Inferencecited by 82
  2. 2014Crypto-Nets: Neural Networks over Encrypted Datacited by 10
  3. 2018Towards Practical Privacy-Preserving Analytics for IoT and Cloud Based Healthcare Systemscited by 2
  4. 2017PrivyNet: A Flexible Framework for Privacy-Preserving Deep Neural Network Trainingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.